Service

Donor & Instrument Mapping

Committing to a submission route before testing fit is expensive. Windows differ on access type, ceiling, risk category and what must exist beforehand.

Scope

The project exists but the financing route does not.

When you need this

The project exists but the financing route does not.

What problem it solves

Committing to a submission route before testing fit is expensive. Windows differ on access type, ceiling, risk category and what must exist beforehand.

What is carried out

  • Which funds and windows the project actually fits
  • Which it does not, and why
  • Access type and accreditation constraints
  • Ceilings, co-financing and concessionality
  • Preconditions to be met before any submission
  • Indicative sequencing across instruments

What you receive

  • A mapped shortlist with reasoning
  • Requirements per route
  • Preconditions and who must satisfy them
  • A recommended route with the trade-offs stated
  • Timeframe2–4 days
  • Inputs neededExisting project documentation, available climate and baseline data, and the name of the target mechanism if one has been chosen.
  • LimitsMapping reflects published requirements at the date of review. Fund rules change; anything used in a submission should be checked against the instrument in force.

Climate Readiness Advisory is an independent practice and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or acting on behalf of the Green Climate Fund, the Adaptation Fund or any other financing institution.

Discuss this service

Climate Readiness Advisory