An orientation to the major multilateral climate funds and development banks: what each instrument is for, how a proposal moves through it, who decides what at which stage, and where submissions usually stall.
The section that defeats most concept notes, taken alone: what counts as hazard and vulnerability evidence, how to attribute a problem to climate drivers rather than to development deficits, and how to build a baseline that survives review.
Building a causal chain a reviewer can follow, with indicators the implementing team can actually collect once the money arrives.
Half or full day for a single organisation, built around the participants’ own pipeline rather than generic examples. Usually more useful than a course for a team preparing a specific submission.
A monthly brief on what changed: fund guidance, template revisions, review criteria updates, and the decisions that show how criteria are applied in practice rather than how they read on paper.
Written for people who need to know whether guidance they relied on last quarter still holds. Free to read, no archive paywall.
